What sports to do in winter


salomonoasis.com keyword stats



Most current Google search phrases:

avalanche sanders design snowboard "winterstick"
most fashionable countries championship ice skate 2007
skateboarding statistics 2007 learn how to waterbend
Ski sizing information skate uk level 1
learn to waterbend go kart leagues in austin

Death, Aging, Rejuvenation (Part 1)

I would like to raise a question: Istheory, at least partially. Many big trials
Rejuvenation possible and how to approach it?and experiments are published in leading
This is just my own opinion about possiblejournals - Science, Nature, PNAS, New England
procedures. I used certain techniques basedJM, JAMA, etc.One bias for caloric
on a theory. As strange as it sounds some ofrestriction experiment in my opinion is
those techniques and procedures mightfollowing. Rats live in cage 30cmX60cm for
actually worked.There are several hundredstheir whole life. There are at least five
theories of aging. New and old ones.rats or 20 mice. They live couple years and
Different authors classify them differently.Idie. During the experiments they are
would divide all those theories into 2 groupscelebrities when they live 5 years - some
:1. Theories of Deterioration from externallucky ones. The Food is a balanced mixture of
cause. "Wear and tear". Theory of freenutrition. Caloric restriction is - 60% of
radicals damage is most fashionable attheir regular meal. They practically don't
present time. Antioxidants are considered amove - there is no space in cage. Mostly they
cure. Benefits of caloric restriction aresleep whole day. Sometime they fight and
often explained by that theory. The theorymate. They live in those conditions at Yale,
has good objective support in scientificat Med U of South Carolina, at Russian State
literature. Other theories of this groupMedical University and I think everywhere
included changes of bacteria in the gut,else. To compare our fellow humans we would
radiation and accumulation of mutationsplace 10 people on area of 20 square metres
during life of an individual, etc. - many(200 sq. feet) for 50 years in a row, feeding
more of those theories were discussed in thethem with what they want but all the same -
XX century. 2. Internal clock - theories.Ilet say junk food from McDonalds.I remember
would divide the "internal clock" theoriesmy cat (who was partially wild) stole meat
into 2 more subgroups: 1. Internal clock onand ate until it started to vomit. He
the level of cell. Telomeres shortening isrepeated it many times when he was able to
the most discussed in literature at present.steal some steak or whatever. The same
2. Internal clock on the level of organism.happens in wild - lions have maybe one
Growth hormone changes was a recent examplesuccessful hunt out of ten. When they catch a
of discussion.Authors are usually veryprey, they eat like crazy. Much more than
cautious and objective in scientificthey can digest at the moment. So it looks
literature. Telomeres are usually discussedlike there is an instinct. Eat as much as
in connection with "immortal" cancer cells.possible. This is not a joke - 60% of people
Caloric restriction is discussed as a mean ofin western countries are overweight. Abundant
longevity (not rejuvenation per se). Level ofhigh calorie food and lack of activity. It
growth hormone (GH) or insulin-like growthdoes not seem that for these people any
factor drops in aged persons.Mass mediainternal mechanism restricts food
speculates wider: telomeres restoration -consumption. Applying this back to rats, we
possible immortal life, growth hormone willcan see that what is considered normal
rejuvenate you, etc.Original scientificconsumption - "ad lib" - maybe actually big
studies usually do not speculate about this.overfeeding of the animals in these cages.In
In no way for example drop of GH level inthis case 60% of caloric restriction would be
elderly means that just giving it back willjust what rats need, just what the calories
make you young again.Scientific literaturethey spend in lazy, uneventful daily life. So
rarely discuss "Rejuvenation" as it is.called "control", "normal" rats - that fed as
Authors mostly talk about "longevity". Thisthey usually fed might be compared for fat
is very different story. Longevity in aoverweight humans. They consume junk food.
wheelchair is very distinct from a youthThey prone to the bunch of diseases of
playing soccer. One proven method to reachobesity and low activity. Heart diseases,
longevity is caloric restriction. Often theystrokes, variety of cancers, arthritis,
say it is the only proven technique. Usingetc.In this case all the hype about caloric
antioxidants as a method to prolong life isrestriction would just be brought to the
in the same category. To put simple, thebusiness of mere balancing diet and activity
Theory says: nutrition produce products ofin so called "calorie-restricted animals". I
oxidation - peroxides, etc. These productshaven't seen any discussion of this problem.
damage DNA, proteins, etc. Cell ages. CaloricI might be wrong. This is why I use caloric
restriction switches metabolic pathways.restriction for myself. I did not work with
There are less free radicals. Henceworms and spiders. But my guess would be that
longevity. Antioxidants work in similar way -they all are also in artificial standardized
they remove free radicals. Anotherconditions. "Control" worms might be also
speculation is that caloric restrictionoverfed. To put rats into bigger cages (to
starting at young age delays reproductive ageincrease activity in control group and
in animals and this slows down biologicalbalance calories and catabolism) would be
clocks and prolongs life until an environmentincredibly expensive.Even at present
with high nutrition supply is found. Animalsconditions because of "animal lovers" and
look small and undeveloped.Caloricbunch of other regulations and considerations
restriction significantly (25%-100% and more)(e.g. sterile conditions), the price of
prolonged life in worms, flies, spiders,animal housing is sky-high.You would say
rats, mice, etc. Experiments on monkeys andanimals in wild would live longer because
humans are under way and will takethey balance activity and consumption. Well,
decades.Well, it is all good in experimentsrecently I read that life span of animals in
and theories. Some argue: why in this casewild is shorter than animals in captivity.
prisoners of concentration camps do not liveCorrect me if I am wrong: pandas live 15-20
longer. Another example came from "Scientificyears in nature and 20-30 in zoos, bears
American" - a person had caloric restriction20-25 in nature and 30-40 in captivity.
of something 20 years or more - no effect -Civilization has certain benefits -
he just looks like very thin undernourishedvaccinations, good medical care, more or less
person of 50 years. Examples of oppositegood hygiene. So just moving into wild
opinion also exist (tribes or groups with lowconditions wouldn't make you younger or allow
food consumption or high antioxidantsto live longer.Now, to discuss rejuvenation
consumption have more centenarians thanprocedures, I would need to talk about aging
general population). Maybe you really need tofirst. In this case Rejuvenation could be
start at 10 years of age, look malnourishedconsidered as reversal of aging
and weak for the whole life and live to 100(deterioration). Longevity is different story
years, getting to your puberty at 25.- it is prolonged life span. Rejuvenation
Antioxidants also bring many controversy.supposedly should lead to longevity. But
Vitamin E did not show many benefits thoughlongevity is not equal to Rejuvenation. Aging
it was a big hope for prevention of manyleads to Death eventually. It is easier to
diseases of old age. And so on. Today therediscuss from that end.All written here is
are big trials that disprove the theory.just plain speculation, take it with a grain
Tomorrow - great experiments that confirm theof salt.



1 A B C D 70 71 72 73 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112